Case Studies Show How Shale Boom Hurt Health and Infrastructure of Four Communities

shalewells

It’s been nearly a decade since the first shale fracking wells were drilled in Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Since that time, there’s been pressure for more gas production in those states, as well as in Ohio, but a series of new studies show that the people who live near the booming industry aren’t always the ones reaping the economic benefits.

The Multi-State Shale Research Collaborative, made up of organizations like Policy Matters Ohio and the Keystone Research Center, examined the impact of shale drilling on four communities—Carroll County, OH, Green and Tioga counties in Pennsylvania and Wetzel County, WV. Collectively, the individual case studies display how small communities become dependent on a process that provides jobs and tax dollars, but also negative health and environmental impacts, as well as higher housing prices and even violence in some cases.

Graphic credit: Multi-State Shale Research Collaborative

Graphic credit: Multi-State Shale Research Collaborative

“The economic benefits of fracking fall far short of what was promised and come with costs to safety, the environment and the community,” reads the executive summary of the Carroll County study.

The four counties are all small, rural and poor but each accounts for a significant portion of its state’s drilling. In Ohio, Carroll County is home to more than half of Ohio’s shale wells.

Each of the counties anticipated a huge job bump to accompany the gas production, but Greene fared the best. From 2005 to 2012, private-sector employment grew by 40.2 percent. However, in West Virginia’s Wetzel County, shale represents only 2 percent of the workforce. In Ohio’s Carroll County, the promise of a job boom has been met the reality of an 8.3-percent unemployment rate with jobs going to out-of-state workers.

Graphic credit: Multi-State Shale Research Collaborative

Graphic credit: Multi-State Shale Research Collaborative

The roads, temporary housing and other infrastructures of three of the four counties were also ill-prepared to handle those transient workers. The companies behind the gas production faced little, if any, regulation. That worries groups like Carroll Concerned Citizens in Ohio. In nearby Youngstown, an executive faces three years in prison for repeatedly dumping fracking wastewater into the Mahoning River.

In 2012 alone, 14.2 million barrels of fracking waste were injected in Ohio’s nearly 200 disposal wells, more than half from states with better regulation, like Pennsylvania and West Virginia, according to the report.

In Greene and Tioga counties in Pennsylvania, the Collaborative found “dramatic” increases in emergency room visits during the boom years of the shale industry. A 2013 study in that stayed showed that fracking made people sick. Though far away in Colorado, a more recent study discovered birth defects in babies near fracking sites. 

Graphic credit: Multi-State Shale Research Collaborative

Graphic credit: Multi-State Shale Research Collaborative

The Collaborative is pushing for more regulations and fees for companies that want to drill more shale wells. Here are the group’s final recommendations:

All four case studies recommend that local officials gather as much information as possible up front before drilling begins in their communities. The Carroll, Greene, and Tioga studies recommend following in the footsteps of Wetzel by creating a local oil and gas taskforce to coordinate discussions between government agencies, local communities, stakeholders and companies.

The Multi-state Shale Research Collaborative has recommended that Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia adopt severance taxes of no less than 5 percent, as is currently assessed in West Virginia, in order to help cover the costs of shale drilling activity. The case studies echo this call, recommending adoption of a severance tax in Pennsylvania and a higher tax rate in Ohio.

The Wetzel case study recommends that drilling communities consider enacting local fees on gas wells and setting aside the revenue for future use.

All four case studies recommend that state and local officials increase investments in fixing and policing the roads and take steps to address the shortage of affordable housing.

The Carroll case study recommends that policymakers protect landowner and citizen rights, while the Greene and Tioga case studies recommend that local landowners organize to help each other navigate the growth of the oil and gas industry.

The Carroll study recommends that policymakers investigate methods to encourage the oil and gas industry to hire more local workers and provide health insurance.

The Greene and Tioga case studies recommend Pennsylvania require that local governments conduct assessments to ensure impact-fee money adequately addresses the impacts of increased drilling. 

——–

YOU ALSO MIGHT LIKE 

Ohio Executive Pleads Guilty, Faces Three Years in Prison For Dumping Fracking Wastewater

New Study Shows Proximity to Fracking Sites Increases Risk of Birth Defects

Duke Study Finds Higher Gas Levels in Drinking Water Wells Near Marcellus Fracking Sites

——– 

[source: http://ecowatch.com/2014/04/10/shale-boom-four-communities/]

Leave a Reply