Arizona regulators reject new solar fixed charges requested by two utilities (but ends net metering)

rejected fixed charge

Out in Arizona, home of the demand charge, the Arizona Corporation Commission rejected a request by two utilities to subject new solar customers to large monthly fixed charges. As part of their recent rate cases, Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) and UNS Electric sought a monthly Grid Access Charge and an inflated monthly Meter Fee. The Commission rejected the proposed Grid Access Charge after agreeing with Vote Solar, Earthjustice, and other solar advocates that the charge would over-recover costs from new solar customers. The Commission also rejected the utilities’ attempt to substantially increase the current Meter Fee and instead adopted Vote Solar’s recommendation for a modest Meter Fee increase.

In addition, the Commission eliminated net metering for new solar customers through the implementation of the Arizona Value of Solar decision that was issued in December 2016. As a result, new solar customers will no longer be compensated for the excess energy they export to the grid at retail rates.


Instead, new solar customers will receive a reduced export compensation rate that is based on utility-scale solar prices.  Existing rooftop solar customers will be grandfathered on to net metering and their current rate design.

“Arizona’s families and businesses should be able to meet their own energy needs with the state’s plentiful sunshine if they so choose,” said Briana Kobor, regulatory director at Vote Solar. “Solar is an investment that supports local jobs, improves energy security and helps build a competitive new energy economy in the state. While today’s decision by the Commission is a missed opportunity for the state to lead, we commend the decision to avoid further penalizing solar customers with additional fees.”

“The utilities’ overly-aggressive proposals would have made rooftop solar uneconomic and halted its growth in southern Arizona,” Earthjustice attorney Michael Hiatt said. “Although today’s net metering decision will unnecessarily chill rooftop solar installations, the Commission’s rejection of excessive solar fixed charges is a win for Arizona families and small businesses who wish to generate their own clean energy.”

— Solar Builder magazine

Nevada rooftop solar industry booms again after 2017 policy change

Nevada solar power

The rooftop solar industry is shining once again in Nevada. NV Energy’s most recent annual plan noted a strong increase in applications for its SolarGenerations rooftop solar program following key state policy changes in 2017 that put the market back on track.

SolarGenerations applications went from 287 in 2016 to 3,308 in 2017, with most applications coming in the second half of the year, after AB 405 was signed into law. This represents an 11-fold year-over-year increase and early monthly data from 2018 indicates continued growth. Solar advocates and industry leaders say Nevada’s rooftop solar success story shows how quickly a stable policy foundation can deliver economic benefits to the state.

“It’s exciting to see this important solar policy delivering for Nevada, clearing the way for families and businesses to go solar once again and invest in the state’s clean energy economy,” said Jessica Scott, Interior West director for Vote Solar. “We are grateful to the 2017 bill sponsors and many other champions on both sides of the aisle who worked so hard on behalf of the people of Nevada to bring solar opportunity back to the state.”

RELATED: Solar workers rally in Connecticut to try to save net metering

Nevada’s renewed rooftop solar growth is a remarkable turnaround from 2016, when a devastating ruling by the Nevada Public Utilities Commission ended the state’s rooftop solar net metering program, which stalled rooftop solar investment and killed thousands of local jobs. During its 2017 session, the Nevada Legislature passed and Gov. Brian Sandoval signed Assembly Bill 405 to reestablish fair net metering credits and clear the way for consumers to go solar once more.

The passage of AB 405 has also prompted news of local workforce expansion from solar companies that are growing to meet rising consumer demand for rooftop solar.

“We are installing solar like crazy. The Robco Electric solar team has increased by 300 percent, and these are all Nevadans put back to work in the solar industry,” said Rob Kowalczik, president of Robco Electric, a Las Vegas-based company.

“Before the ink was dry on AB 405 – Nevada’s landmark Solar Bill of Rights – I started rehiring dozens of our workers who I was forced to lay off just 18 months earlier because of anti-solar net metering changes. We hope legislators across the country look to Nevada and see that there is incredible voter demand for solar choice. All states should take strong steps to protect access to clean, affordable local energy,” said Larry Cohen, branch manager for Sunrun, a national solar installation firm with offices in Las Vegas.

“We were thrilled to have the opportunity to relaunch our business operations in Nevada last year,” said Vivint Solar CEO David Bywater. “Nevadans have eagerly embraced the return of solar energy, which has allowed us to provide local jobs and contribute to the state’s economy.”

AB 405 was one of nine clean-energy bills signed into law last summer in Nevada. Voters will have the opportunity to further advance the state’s growing clean energy economy this November with a ballot initiative that would increase the amount of renewable sources – such as wind, solar and geothermal – powering the state to 50 percent by 2030.

— Solar Builder magazine

South Carolina legislators trying to raise solar net metering cap again

south carolina net metering

South Carolina lawmakers approved a measure that will raise the limit on the number of South Carolinians that can invest in solar and earn credit for their excess power. Amendment 9, which was approved as part of House Bill 4950, will raise the net metering cap from its current 2% to 4%.

“Last night’s vote is an important and welcome step forward for energy freedom in South Carolina,” said Thad Culley, Regional Director at Vote Solar. “Recent months revealed both the enormous support from residents, businesses, and organizations across the political spectrum for clean energy options, lower utility bills and 3,000 solar jobs in South Carolina, and the lengths that utility monopolies will go to undermine all three.

But this is just one step. From here, HB 4950 will head next to a budget conference committee where the bill will have to be reconciled with the State Senate’s version. The solar amendment could get cut there. Reminder that utilities stepped in at the last second and killed a bill that would have lifted the net metering cap altogether.

“We now look to lawmakers in the budget conference committee to take all solar measures across the finish line and ensure that solar can remain a bright spot in South Carolina’s economy,” Culley said.

Duke Energy Carolinas is likely to hit its net metering cap soon, and SCE&G is expected to hit its cap by the end of the year.

— Solar Builder magazine

Solar workers rally in Connecticut to try save net metering

solar net metering connecticut

Solar workers and advocates from over a dozen companies across Connecticut filled the area in front of the Connecticut’s Capitol Building’s north entrance with signs reading “Save Solar Jobs,” and “Fix SB9.” The rally was organized jointly by Solar Connecticut and The Alliance for Solar Choice, with participation from at least a dozen national and local companies that install solar panels on Connecticut homes.

“Connecticut’s solar industry employs more than two-thousand workers, generates tens of millions of dollars in tax revenue to the state, and helps consumers reduce their energy bills in one of America’s highest energy costs states,” said Mike Trahan, Executive Director of SolarConnecticut. “Despite what Governor Malloy and officials at the Department of Energy say, there’s nothing wrong with the way solar gets done in Connecticut. What’s wrong is proposed legislation that’s heavily tilted toward preserving the status quo for Connecticut’s electric power companies.”

The workers were rallying to encourage state lawmakers to fix Senate Bill 9, which is the classic sleight of hand “clean energy bill” seen in many states that boosts the state’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), while wiping out the favorable economics of net metering.  Only three weeks are left in the legislative session in which SB9 could be amended to avoid the loss of an estimated 2,000 solar jobs, advocates say.

Stephen Lassiter, spokesperson for The Alliance for Solar Choice, added, “Senate Bill 9 is a job killer. Connecticut should not go the way of Nevada or Maine, which ended net metering and lost thousands of jobs. To protect jobs and support clean energy, legislators should defend net metering and avoid any cap on solar investment.”

— Solar Builder magazine

Utilities scramble at last second to defeat popular solar bill in South Carolina

south carolina solar net metering

Less than a week after the South Carolina House passed House Bill 4421 (the Electric Consumer Bill of Rights Act) with bipasrtisan support, the bill stalled after utilities raised a technical point that required the House to approve the legislation by a two-thirds majority. In today’s vote, the House voted for the bill, 61-44, exceeding a simple majority but falling short of the new two-thirds requirement.

H. 4421 would have lifted a restrictive 2% cap on the state’s successful net metering program. Net metering makes sure solar customers get fair credit on their utility bills for the valuable solar power they send to the energy grid, which lowers costs for all consumers by reducing reliance on expensive utility power plants.

The Post Courier says SCANA and Duke Energy, the state’s largest power providers, “fought vociferously against the bill, arguing that it would force non-solar customers to subsidize homeowners with panels.” FYI: South Carolinians pay some of the highest utility bills in the country.

An amendment added to the measure sought to undercut that argument by forcing the utilities to eat the costs of the subsidy rather than passing it on to consumers. That would amount to about $1.2 million in additional costs for Duke Energy and $4.4 million for SCANA, according to regulatory filings. Several lawmakers on the House floor pointed out that the CEOs of each of those companies make significantly more money than that in annual total compensation.

Following is a statement from Vote Solar’s Southeast Regional Director, Thad Culley:

“After finding such strong bipartisan support from both lawmakers and voters, it’s disappointing that – with this procedural stunt – the interests of a couple monopoly utilities outweighed the people of South Carolina who overwhelmingly want support solar energy options and property rights. Make no mistake, this puts thousands of local solar jobs and real energy bill savings for consumers at risk.”

— Solar Builder magazine