{"id":18022,"date":"2013-10-30T18:31:28","date_gmt":"2013-10-30T18:31:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/?p=309796"},"modified":"2013-10-30T18:31:28","modified_gmt":"2013-10-30T18:31:28","slug":"ge-food-labeling-initiative-up-against-record-breaking-donations-from-corporate-giants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/ge-food-labeling-initiative-up-against-record-breaking-donations-from-corporate-giants\/","title":{"rendered":"GE Food Labeling Initiative Up Against Record-Breaking Donations From Corporate Giants"},"content":{"rendered":null,"protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" src=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/I522gelabel-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"I522gelabel\"><\/p>\n<p>A group fighting the Nov. 5 &nbsp;ballot measure that would mandate labeling of <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/category\/news\/agriculture-news\/food-agriculture\/gmo-genetically-modified-organism\/\" target=\"_blank\">genetically engineered<\/a> (GE) foods in Washington has <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.seattletimes.com\/politicsnorthwest\/2013\/10\/28\/no-on-522-breaks-fundraising-record-for-washington-initiative-campaigns\/\" target=\"_blank\">broken the record<\/a> for the most money raised by an initiative campaign in that state.<\/p>\n<p>With a $540,000 donation from Monsanto on Monday, the No on 522 Committee has raised nearly $22.9 million to defeat <a href=\"http:\/\/yeson522.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">I-522<\/a>, a citizens&#8217; initiative that would require foods containing GE ingredients to carry a label, according to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pdc.wa.gov\/MvcQuerySystem\/Committee\/initiative_committees?year=2013\" target=\"_blank\">campaign records<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/I-522.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"I-522\" src=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/I-522.jpg\" width=\"480\" height=\"742\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The No on 522 committee is largely financed by five biotechnology giants and a food industry group.&nbsp;About half of the money came from the large food processing companies that were <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2013\/09\/18\/lobbyists-to-stop-ge-labeling-in-wa\/\" target=\"_blank\">donating anonymously through<\/a>&nbsp;the Grocery Manufacturers Association until a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cornucopia.org\/2013\/10\/wa-state-attorney-general-ferguson-files-suit-grocery-manufacturers-association\/?utm_source=feedly\" target=\"_blank\">lawsuit<\/a> by the state attorney general forced the lobby group to release their names.<\/p>\n<p>Biotech and agrichemical firms including Monsanto, Bayer CropScience and Dupont are largely responsible for the rest of the war chest. Monsanto, the second-highest contributor,&nbsp;has donated $5.37 million.&nbsp;The No on 522 campaign has spent $13.5 million, according to state records.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Money appears to be making a <a href=\"http:\/\/truth-out.org\/news\/item\/19698-revealed-big-processed-food-companies-spend-millions-to-defeat-washington-gmo-labeling-initiative\" target=\"_blank\">big difference<\/a>. In September, before both sides began spending on TV ads, GE labeling supporters held a 45-point lead, according to an Elway Poll. Just weeks after ads began to roll out across the state,&nbsp;an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.documentcloud.org\/documents\/808500-elway-poll.html\" target=\"_blank\">Oct. 21 poll<\/a> showed&nbsp;that just 46 percent of voters supported the initiative and 42 percent were opposed.<\/p>\n<p>Yes on 522, the&nbsp;campaign for GE labeling, has already been outspent by the opposition, with $6.8 million raised and $5.4 million spent. The campaign has received large chunks of its funding from natural products companies, organics firms and alternative health companies.&nbsp;The <a href=\"http:\/\/kuow.org\/post\/monsanto-pours-46-million-anti-gmo-labeling-campaign\" target=\"_blank\">biggest supporter<\/a> of I-522 is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.drbronner.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Dr. Bronner&#8217;s Magic Soaps<\/a> of Escondido, CA, which has contributed $950,000. Other <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2013\/09\/13\/organic-leaders-support-ge-food-labeling\/\" target=\"_blank\">supporters<\/a> include, <a href=\"http:\/\/nutiva.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Nutiva<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/us.naturespath.com\/home\" target=\"_blank\">Nature&rsquo;s Path<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.clifbar.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Clif Bar<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.organicvalley.coop\/\" target=\"_blank\">Organic Valley<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2013\/10\/29\/brads-raw-foods-founder-shares-kale-chips-landed-7000-store-shelves\/\" target=\"_blank\">Brad&#8217;s Raw Foods<\/a>, and&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.mercola.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Mercola.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Supporters of the labeling initiative in Washington state fear a <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2013\/08\/21\/washington-gmo-labeling-campaign-californiaf\/\" target=\"_blank\">reprise of a similar measure<\/a> in California in 2012, where&nbsp;Monsanto contributed $8.1 million to a successful effort to defeat California&rsquo;s Proposition 37. Monsanto was the No on 37 campaign&rsquo;s biggest contributor.<\/p>\n<p>Immediate&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/action.yeson522.com\/page\/m\/23891c08\/513cc39a\/75b3a37a\/9fa22b4\/233138312\/VEsF\/\">donations are&nbsp;needed<\/a> to fight back against the Monsanto corporate cash, said Delana Jones, campaign manager for Yes on 522.<\/p>\n<p>Listen to what&nbsp;Dr. Michael Hansen, senior scientist for <a href=\"http:\/\/consumersunion.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Consumers Union,<\/a> has to say about the GE food labeling initiative:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Visit EcoWatch&rsquo;s&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.org\/p\/food\/gmo-genetically-modified-organism\/\" target=\"_blank\">GE FOOD<\/a><\/strong>&nbsp;page for more related news on this topic.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/oi.vresp.com\/?fid=00b11039e0\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"topnewsbanner12\" src=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/topnewsbanner121.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"120\"><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,57],"tags":[12201,1791,10215,12202,10400],"class_list":["post-18022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-green-building-posts","category-leed-news","tag-featured-living","tag-food","tag-genetically-engineered-foods","tag-living","tag-monsanto"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18022\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}