{"id":18296,"date":"2013-11-06T14:12:45","date_gmt":"2013-11-06T14:12:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/?p=311109"},"modified":"2013-11-06T14:12:45","modified_gmt":"2013-11-06T14:12:45","slug":"washington-votes-down-initiative-522-to-label-gmo-foods","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/washington-votes-down-initiative-522-to-label-gmo-foods\/","title":{"rendered":"Washington Votes Down Initiative 522 to Label GMO Foods"},"content":{"rendered":null,"protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" src=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/11\/gmograin-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"The initiative campaign put Washington at center stage in debates over both genetic engineering and the role of out-of-state funding in elections. Photo credit: Shutterstock\"><\/p>\n<p>Washington state voters on Tuesday rejected an initiative that would have required foods containing <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/category\/news\/agriculture-news\/food-agriculture\/gmo-genetically-modified-organism\/\" target=\"_blank\">genetically modified organisms<\/a> (GMOs) to be labeled.<\/p>\n<p>Had it passed, <a href=\"http:\/\/yeson522.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Initiative 522<\/a> would have made the state the first in the nation to require such labeling.<\/p>\n<p>The vote was 54.8 percent opposed to labeling and 45.2 percent in favor of it, <em>USA Today<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/\" target=\"_blank\">reported<\/a>.&nbsp;The measure led in only three counties.<\/p>\n[caption id=\"attachment_311113\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"500\"]<a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/11\/gmograin.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"The initiative campaign put Washington at center stage in debates over both genetic engineering and the role of out-of-state funding in elections. Photo credit: Shutterstock\" src=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/11\/gmograin.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"300\"><\/a> The initiative campaign put Washington at center stage in debates over both genetic engineering and the role of out-of-state funding in elections. Photo credit: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shutterstock.com\/pic-148937711\/stock-photo-biotechnology-engineer-on-field-examining-ripe-ears-of-grain.html\">Shutterstock<\/a>[\/caption]\n<p>Opponents of the measure, backed by Monsanto and other large agribusinesses, outspent proponents by a ratio of nearly 3-to-1, making the initiative campaign the <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2013\/11\/04\/millions-against-monsanto-gmo-battle\/\" target=\"_blank\">costliest in state history<\/a>. The No on 522 campaign brought in $22 million in donations, and the <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2013\/10\/30\/ge-food-labeling-donations\/\" target=\"_blank\">top five&nbsp;contributors<\/a> were the Grocery Manufacturers Association, Monsanto, DuPont Pioneer, Dow AgroSciences and Bayer CropScience.<\/p>\n<p>The largest donor to the pro-labeling campaign were California-based <a href=\"http:\/\/www.drbronner.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Dr. Bronner&#8217;s Magic Soaps<\/a> and the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.centerforfoodsafety.org\/#showJoin\" target=\"_blank\">Center for Food Safety<\/a> in Washington, D.C. However the initiative garnered almost 30 percent of its funding from individuals in Washington state, the <em>Seattle&nbsp;<\/em><i>Times<\/i>&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/seattletimes.com\/html\/localnews\/2022198304_gmoelectionxml.html\" target=\"_blank\">reported<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;Win or lose, this is a long war,&rdquo; <a href=\"http:\/\/seattletimes.com\/html\/localnews\/2022198304_gmoelectionxml.html\" target=\"_blank\">said<\/a> David Bronner, CEO of Dr. Bronner&rsquo;s Magic Soaps, the initiative&rsquo;s biggest donor. &ldquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2013\/10\/17\/ge-food-advocate-urges-industry-to-gmo-labeling\/\" target=\"_blank\">Labeling<\/a>&nbsp;is inevitable.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Cary Condotta (R-East Wenatchee) and a co-chair of the &ldquo;Yes&rdquo; campaign, told the <em>Seattle Times<\/em> there is an upside to the election&mdash;90 percent of Washington residents now know what (GMOs) are. &ldquo;The movement continues,&rdquo; he said.<\/p>\n<p>Consumers have a right to know what&rsquo;s in their food, supporters contend.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Sooner or later, one of these is going to pass. It&#8217;s only a matter of time. At some point the industry is going to get tired of pouring this kind of money into these campaigns,&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.foodpolitics.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Marion Nestle<\/a>, a professor of nutrition at New York University, told <em>USA Today<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>She said she doesn&#8217;t believe there&#8217;s anything dangerous about genetically engineered foods but is concerned about corporate control of the food supply.<\/p>\n<p>The Food and Drug Administration does not require foods containing genetically engineered ingredients to be labeled because it considers them &#8220;functionally equivalent&#8221; to conventionally grown crops.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Visit EcoWatch&rsquo;s&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.org\/p\/food\/gmo-genetically-modified-organism\/\" target=\"_blank\">GMO<\/a>&nbsp;<\/strong>page for more related news on this topic.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/newsletter-signup\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"topnewsbanner121\" src=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/topnewsbanner1211.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"120\"><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,57],"tags":[12201,1791,10215,9311,12202],"class_list":["post-18296","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-green-building-posts","category-leed-news","tag-featured-living","tag-food","tag-genetically-engineered-foods","tag-gmos","tag-living"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18296","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18296"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18296\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18296"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18296"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18296"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}