{"id":22230,"date":"2014-02-18T17:32:58","date_gmt":"2014-02-18T17:32:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/?p=321987"},"modified":"2014-02-18T17:32:58","modified_gmt":"2014-02-18T17:32:58","slug":"mainstream-media-goes-big-on-climate-change-and-extreme-weather-coverage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/mainstream-media-goes-big-on-climate-change-and-extreme-weather-coverage\/","title":{"rendered":"Mainstream Media Goes Big on Climate Change and Extreme Weather Coverage"},"content":{"rendered":null,"protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" src=\"http:\/\/files.cdn.ecowatch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Un1-150x150.png\" alt=\"Un\"><\/p>\n<p>By Thomas Bishop and Samantha Wyatt<\/p>\n<p>This week, all four major broadcast networks covered extreme weather and <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/category\/climate-change-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">climate change<\/a> on their&nbsp;Sunday&nbsp;morning political talk&nbsp;shows.&nbsp;Those programs have largely ignored global warming in recent years, making their effort to address the issue unusual and laudable. But several of the segments also demonstrated the vulnerability inherent in treating science as a political debate where both sides receive a platform to air their positions.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2014\/02\/18\/mainstream-media-big-climate-extreme-weather-coverage\/un-5\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-322011\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Un\" src=\"http:\/\/files.cdn.ecowatch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Un1.png\" width=\"500\" height=\"300\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Major&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/news\/massive-storm-moves-north-hitting-mid-atlantic-northeast\/\" target=\"_blank\">winter storms<\/a>&nbsp;across the U.S. in the month of February, drought in California,&nbsp;and <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2014\/02\/14\/president-obama-pledges-2-billion-drought-stricken-california\/\" target=\"_blank\">President Obama&#8217;s&nbsp;call&nbsp;for a $1 billion climate change &#8220;resilience fund&#8221;<\/a>&nbsp;sparked debates&nbsp;this week over the need for action against climate change.&nbsp;The science of global warming is settled: according to one survey, <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2013\/05\/16\/97-percent-scientists-agree-climate-change-man-made\/\" target=\"_blank\">97 percent of&nbsp;climate&nbsp;scientists<\/a>&nbsp;agree that climate change is real and that &#8220;humans are causing global warming.&#8221;&nbsp;But the&nbsp;Sunday&nbsp;shows, because they are built on a model of showing political conflicts, have difficulty putting that fact in context.<\/p>\n<p>ABC&#8217;s&nbsp;<i>This Week&nbsp;<\/i>and NBC&#8217;s&nbsp;<i>Meet the Press<\/i>&nbsp;both featured debates between&nbsp;individuals who support and oppose the overwhelming scientific consensus on climate change, <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2013\/10\/16\/mainstream-media-fossil-fuel-funded-propaganda\/\" target=\"_blank\">creating a false balance that could serve to confuse their viewers<\/a>. Fox Broadcasting Co.&#8217;s&nbsp;<i>Fox News&nbsp;Sunday<\/i>, meanwhile, hosted a discussion in which no panelist stated that human-caused climate change is occurring while several claimed that it is not. CBS&#8217;&nbsp;<i>Face the Nation<\/i>, by contrast, featured an interview with a scientist who explained that &#8220;we know that climate change is happening and humans are contributing.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The broadcast&nbsp;Sunday&nbsp;shows devoted a paltry 27 minutes of coverage to climate change in 2013, according to a&nbsp;<i>Media Matters<\/i>&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/research\/2014\/01\/16\/study-how-broadcast-news-covered-climate-change\/197612\" target=\"_blank\">study<\/a>. Nearly 60 percent of that coverage came on&nbsp;<i>Face the Nation<\/i>&mdash;<i>Meet the Press<\/i>&nbsp;did not mention the issue all year.&nbsp;<i>Face the Nation<\/i>&nbsp;also featured the first interview of a scientist to discuss global warming by any of the programs in five years.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a good sign that the&nbsp;Sunday&nbsp;shows are addressing global warming, but treating it as just another political issue causes new complications.<\/p>\n<p><strong><i>Fox News Sunday:&nbsp;<\/i>Panel Of Journalists Attack Climate Change Consensus<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Fox&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/embed\/clips\/2014\/02\/16\/34076\/fnc-fns-20140216-climatechange\" target=\"_blank\">did not depart<\/a>&nbsp;from its usual treatment of climate change, as&nbsp;<i>Fox News&nbsp;Sunday&nbsp;<\/i>host Chris Wallace questioned the legitimacy of President Obama&#8217;s proposal to establish a Climate Resilience Fund to help prepare communities for the consequences of extreme weather events. Wallace&nbsp;claimed&nbsp;that the president&#8217;s &#8220;case may seem a bit hard to make when the <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2014\/01\/07\/polar-vortex-does-not-disprove-global-warming\/\" target=\"_blank\">eastern half of the country is in the grips of a brutal winter<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Wallace immediately turned to self-proclaimed climate change denier and <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2013\/10\/02\/george-will-good-fit-for-foxs-climate-of-doubt\/\" target=\"_blank\">Fox News contributor George Will<\/a>, who said that he doesn&#8217;t &#8220;buy&#8221; the president&#8217;s focus on global warming because &#8220;the climate is always changing.&#8221;&nbsp;Will went on to suggest that President Obama claiming that &#8220;the debate is over&#8221; on global warming simply proves that &#8220;the debate is raging and he&#8217;s losing it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Also during the segment, Fox News contributor Kirsten Powers described the importance of climate change as &#8220;an article of faith on the left&#8221;;&nbsp;<i>The Wall Street Journal<\/i>&#8216;s Kimberley Strassel said that activists started referring to &#8220;climate change&#8221; &#8220;when you couldn&#8217;t prove that there was much global warming anymore&nbsp;&#8230; <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2014\/02\/05\/wmo-no-climate-change-standstill-continue-generations\/\" target=\"_blank\">as the temperature didn&#8217;t change<\/a>&#8220;;&nbsp;and&nbsp;<i>The Washington Post<\/i>&#8216;s Charles Lane referred to climate change as a &#8220;rich man&#8217;s issue.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>ABC&#8217;s&nbsp;<i>This Week<\/i>: Politicians Debate Scientists On Impact Of Climate Change<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>ABC&#8217;s&nbsp;<i>This Week&nbsp;<\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/embed\/clips\/2014\/02\/16\/34074\/abc-tw-20140216-climatechange\" target=\"_blank\">dedicated<\/a>&nbsp;a panel discussion to extreme weather, which turned to a conversation about climate change&nbsp;after&nbsp;Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti said that severe droughts &#8220;are becoming the status quo&#8221; in the state.<\/p>\n<p><i>This Week<\/i>&nbsp;provided a platform for&nbsp;climatologist Heidi Cullen, who&nbsp;attributed extreme weather events to climate change and specified that &#8220;this winter certainly doesn&#8217;t disprove global warming.&#8221;&nbsp;She also explained that &#8220;January is probably going to come in as one of the top three Januarys on record, and the ten warmest years have all happened since 1998.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>However, ABC&nbsp;also offered climate change denier Gov. McCrory (R-NC) a platform to dispute the reality of global warming. When asked about his previous comments that &#8220;climate change is in God&#8217;s hands,&#8221; McCrory responded that &#8220;there is climate change, but I&#8217;m not sure you can call it climate warming anymore especially here in the Carolinas.&#8221; McCrory&nbsp;added&nbsp;that &#8220;the big debate is how much of it is man-made&nbsp;and how much will just naturally happen as Earth evolves.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>NBC&#8217;s&nbsp;<i>Meet the Press<\/i>: Republican Representative Debates Bill Nye<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>NBC&#8217;s&nbsp;<i>Meet&nbsp;the Press&nbsp;<\/i>also&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/watch\/meet-the-press\/flurry-of-storms-a-result-of-climate-change-155284035966\" target=\"_blank\">devoted<\/a>&nbsp;a full segment to climate change, which <a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/2014\/02\/17\/bill-nye-debate-congresswoman-climate-change\/\" target=\"_blank\">featured science educator Bill Nye and Rep. Blackburn<\/a> (R-TN), who denies the scientific consensus on global warming.<\/p>\n<p>Host David Gregory opened&nbsp;the segment&nbsp;by stating that the consensus within the scientific community is that climate change is real&nbsp;and caused by humans,&nbsp;and repeatedly refuted Blackburn&#8217;s claims to the contrary. But because NBC was hosting a climate change denier, the format of&nbsp;the discussion&nbsp;ensured that false claims would enter the debate.&nbsp;Blackburn claimed that &#8220;there is not agreement around the fact of exactly what is causing&#8221; climate change, said that any increase in carbon in the atmosphere is &#8220;very slight,&#8221; and claimed that &#8220;there is not consensus&#8221; on climate change among the scientific community. Nye pushed back, citing &#8220;overwhelming evidence that the climate is changing. That you cannot tie any one event to that is not the same as doubt about the whole thing.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>CBS&#8217;&nbsp;<i>Face the Nation<\/i>: Scientist Explains That &#8220;Climate Change Is Happening And Humans Are Contributing&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Unlike its counterparts, CBS did not create false balance during its climate change segment, which&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/embed\/clips\/2014\/02\/16\/34073\/cbs-facethenation-20140216-climatechangereal\" target=\"_blank\">featured<\/a>&nbsp;Dr. Marshall Shepherd, the former head of the American Meteorological Association, about the role of climate change in the winter storms. Shepherd explained&nbsp;to&nbsp;<i>Face the Nation&nbsp;<\/i>host Bob Schieffer&nbsp;that some evidence exists linking the effects of climate change to harsh winter storms and added that &#8220;we know that climate change is happening and humans are contributing&#8221;:<\/p>\n<p>SCHIEFFER: Well is this something that is happened naturally? Is this a result of things that are happening here on&nbsp;Earth? What&#8217;s this all about?<\/p>\n<p>DR. SHEPHERD:&nbsp;Yeah, yeah&nbsp;a couple of things. Let me say about that when we get winter weather, cold conditions,&nbsp;you know,&nbsp;you&#8217;ve got some that will say &#8220;well why are you&nbsp;guys&nbsp;worried about climate change or global warming,&nbsp;I mean it&#8217;s cold and snowing?&#8221; And I&#8217;ll say&nbsp;&#8220;you know it&#8217;s winter&mdash;its January or February,&nbsp;we get snow storms.&#8221;&nbsp;That&#8217;s important&mdash;that&#8217;s like saying because it&#8217;s night time the sun doesn&#8217;t exist anymore. On the other hand though,&nbsp;there is evidence,&nbsp;there&#8217;s some&nbsp;scientific literature that suggests that&nbsp;Jetstream patterns can be affected by the amplified warming&nbsp;that we&#8217;re seeing&nbsp;up in the&nbsp;Arctic, because of climate change or global warming. Now that&#8217;s real. We know that climate change is happening and humans are contributing. I&#8217;m not quite ready to say that this snow storm we saw this week or&nbsp;last week is caused by global warming or climate change.&nbsp;But one thing I will emphasize, I&nbsp;think that we have forgotten how to be cold or deal with snowstorms because we are seeing so few of these big storms like we&#8217;ve seen and that probably is because of climate warming.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Visit EcoWatch&rsquo;s&nbsp;<\/strong><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/p\/air\/climate-change-air\/\" target=\"_blank\">CLIMATE CHANGE<\/a><\/strong> <strong>page for more related news on this topic.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/ecowatch.com\/newsletter-signup\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-321605\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"topnewsbanner13\" src=\"http:\/\/files.cdn.ecowatch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/topnewsbanner131.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"120\"><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,57],"tags":[754,12199,2906],"class_list":["post-22230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-green-building-posts","category-leed-news","tag-climate-change","tag-featured-news","tag-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22230"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22230\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leedpoints.com\/green-building-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}