Tag: existing buildings
-
What’s old is new (and green)
Gerding Edlen’s office inside the renovated historic Meier & Frank warehouse, also home to Vestas’ global headquarters.Trends in sustainable construction are ever evolving as new technologies and more sustainable building materials are continuously being tested and introduced into the market. However, one of the biggest evolutions in sustainable construction has nothing to do with cutting edge technology. Rather it is the re-emphasis on that fact that the greenest buildings can be the ones that are already built. Buildings from prior generations don’t suffer from the planned obsolescence that we have engineered into modern consumer products.
There is a wealth of literature explaining the merits of new sustainable construction – less impact on the environment, lower energy and maintenance costs, healthier environment for tenants. However, more recent studies have proven that green retrofits of existing buildings have less long-term environmental impact than the demolition and new construction of a green building on the site, while offering the same benefits as new construction.
For full disclosure, renovations of existing buildings rarely create the highest performing buildings. But it is important to remember that we are not talking about creating the highest-performing building possible utilizing the most cutting edge technology and construction practices. The conversation is about the total sustainable footprint and overarching impact to the environment. The improvements to existing buildings, plus the embodied energy already present, make them preferable in the building life cycle.
Consider the amount of energy and materials that go into a new construction project and the amount of time elapsed to overcome the environmental impact. A recent study suggests that it can take a minimum of 10 and as many as 80 years to offset the climate change impacts of the demolition and construction of a new green building, even one that is 30 percent more energy efficient than the building it replaced. This takes into account all of the energy expended to manufacture the building materials, transport those materials to the job site and, of course, the energy used during the actual construction phase.
Building owners and operators are catching on. Within the past few years, green renovation or retrofits have been happening in some very high-profile buildings. The famous Merchandise Mart in Chicago – all 4.2 million square feet of it – was awarded a LEED certification after undergoing a top-to-bottom green retrofit, completed in 2009. And the iconic Empire State Building was awarded a LEED-Gold certification in 2011 after a massive ‘green up’ of the building was completed. Skanska managed to get its floor on the building’s 32nd floor to LEED Platinum. In Portland, an old vacant Meier & Frank department store warehouse built in 1927 was renovated and now serves as the LEED Platinum-certified North American corporate headquarters for the Danish wind company, Vestas.
[pagebreak]Building owners and developers aren’t looking at green retrofits to help just the environment. They have determined that it makes good business sense, too. The investments in green retrofits have a fairly fast pay back in the form of lower operating costs. Perhaps, most important, landlords have the opportunity to raise lease rates because the building is more competitive and attractive in the local market. And given the choice, many progressive tenants prefer the sense of place and narrative that only existing buildings can create.
That’s not to say there are no challenges. While the market is starting to catch on, green retrofits are anything but simple endeavors. There is much more investigative work that must happen. What do the current systems look like? Are they up to par with today’s standards? There are clear challenges when it comes to meeting current codes for fire, accessibility and seismic, and sometimes these are fatal flaws in the economics of the deal.
Of course, new sustainable development and construction is vital to the environment and economy long term. Buildings account for 40 percent of the energy consumed in the United States and in turn emit roughly the same share of the gases associated with climate change. It is vitally important that new construction is designed and built to minimize environmental impact, create energy efficiencies and increase occupant health and safety. However, the ‘greening’ of buildings is not limited to new construction. In fact, the fastest way to reverse climate change in the near term, given the vast amount of reusable building stock that already exists, is to ‘green up’ those buildings.
Putting an environmental value on any project is always a complicated equation with competing variables stretched out over long timelines. However, it is with a sense of optimism that we can pour our efforts into retrofitting existing building stock. No longer relegated to a stop-gap measure, renovations are an essential complement to raising the performance of our entire inventory.
Steve Clem is vice president of preconstruction in the Portland office of Skanska USA Building and specializes in sustainable building. He can be reached at Steve.Clem@skanska.com.
Front page image courtesy of flickr user Outsanity Photos.
-
What’s old is new (and green)
Gerding Edlen’s office inside the renovated historic Meier & Frank warehouse, also home to Vestas’ global headquarters.Trends in sustainable construction are ever evolving as new technologies and more sustainable building materials are continuously being tested and introduced into the market. However, one of the biggest evolutions in sustainable construction has nothing to do with cutting edge technology. Rather it is the re-emphasis on that fact that the greenest buildings can be the ones that are already built. Buildings from prior generations don’t suffer from the planned obsolescence that we have engineered into modern consumer products.
There is a wealth of literature explaining the merits of new sustainable construction – less impact on the environment, lower energy and maintenance costs, healthier environment for tenants. However, more recent studies have proven that green retrofits of existing buildings have less long-term environmental impact than the demolition and new construction of a green building on the site, while offering the same benefits as new construction.
For full disclosure, renovations of existing buildings rarely create the highest performing buildings. But it is important to remember that we are not talking about creating the highest-performing building possible utilizing the most cutting edge technology and construction practices. The conversation is about the total sustainable footprint and overarching impact to the environment. The improvements to existing buildings, plus the embodied energy already present, make them preferable in the building life cycle.
Consider the amount of energy and materials that go into a new construction project and the amount of time elapsed to overcome the environmental impact. A recent study suggests that it can take a minimum of 10 and as many as 80 years to offset the climate change impacts of the demolition and construction of a new green building, even one that is 30 percent more energy efficient than the building it replaced. This takes into account all of the energy expended to manufacture the building materials, transport those materials to the job site and, of course, the energy used during the actual construction phase.
Building owners and operators are catching on. Within the past few years, green renovation or retrofits have been happening in some very high-profile buildings. The famous Merchandise Mart in Chicago – all 4.2 million square feet of it – was awarded a LEED certification after undergoing a top-to-bottom green retrofit, completed in 2009. And the iconic Empire State Building was awarded a LEED-Gold certification in 2011 after a massive ‘green up’ of the building was completed. Skanska managed to get its floor on the building’s 32nd floor to LEED Platinum. In Portland, an old vacant Meier & Frank department store warehouse built in 1927 was renovated and now serves as the LEED Platinum-certified North American corporate headquarters for the Danish wind company, Vestas.
[pagebreak]Building owners and developers aren’t looking at green retrofits to help just the environment. They have determined that it makes good business sense, too. The investments in green retrofits have a fairly fast pay back in the form of lower operating costs. Perhaps, most important, landlords have the opportunity to raise lease rates because the building is more competitive and attractive in the local market. And given the choice, many progressive tenants prefer the sense of place and narrative that only existing buildings can create.
That’s not to say there are no challenges. While the market is starting to catch on, green retrofits are anything but simple endeavors. There is much more investigative work that must happen. What do the current systems look like? Are they up to par with today’s standards? There are clear challenges when it comes to meeting current codes for fire, accessibility and seismic, and sometimes these are fatal flaws in the economics of the deal.
Of course, new sustainable development and construction is vital to the environment and economy long term. Buildings account for 40 percent of the energy consumed in the United States and in turn emit roughly the same share of the gases associated with climate change. It is vitally important that new construction is designed and built to minimize environmental impact, create energy efficiencies and increase occupant health and safety. However, the ‘greening’ of buildings is not limited to new construction. In fact, the fastest way to reverse climate change in the near term, given the vast amount of reusable building stock that already exists, is to ‘green up’ those buildings.
Putting an environmental value on any project is always a complicated equation with competing variables stretched out over long timelines. However, it is with a sense of optimism that we can pour our efforts into retrofitting existing building stock. No longer relegated to a stop-gap measure, renovations are an essential complement to raising the performance of our entire inventory.
Steve Clem is vice president of preconstruction in the Portland office of Skanska USA Building and specializes in sustainable building. He can be reached at Steve.Clem@skanska.com.
Front page image courtesy of flickr user Outsanity Photos.
-
The EBies: Honoring Great Work in Buildings Gone Green
William Nutt Associate, Marketing and Communications U.S. Green Building Council Urban Green Council, the New York City chapter of USGBC, held the first-ever EBie Awards on June 28th at the Hard Rock Café Theater. Though this marks the first public s…
-
The EBies: Honoring Great Work in Buildings Gone Green
Sixty-seven entries were submitted; the jurors narrowed the list down to a select 18 finalists, and then chose the winners. Winning the All-Rounder was Glen Neville, a Director of Deutsche Bank, with a team from Jones Lang LaSalle for the Deutsche Bank Americas Headquarters at 60 Wall Street. Maintenance, operational, and capital improvements to the property increased its energy and water efficiency as it moves towards a goal of carbon neutrality by 2013. Included in the spectacular outcome of this $8 million project is the creation of a 123KW flat panel solar array – the largest rooftop array in New York City.William Nutt
Associate, Marketing and Communications
U.S. Green Building Council
Urban Green Council, the New York City chapter of USGBC, held the first-ever EBie Awards on June 28th at the Hard Rock Café Theater. Though this marks the first public showcase for the EBies, the project reflects concepts and ideas that have been discussed for years by NYC leaders in sustainability. The basic idea is this: We need to recognize and encourage the people who are making amazing improvements to existing buildings (hence “EB”ies). Last month, a total of 10 projects from around the country received awards across eight categories.
Forty percent energy savings over the past three years earned Jesse Dillard of the Dallas Museum of Art the Reformed Gas Guzzler Award thanks to lighting, HVAC and water heater retrofits. The Reformed Drinker Award went to Steve Allwine of the Johnson Braund office building in Seattle for reducing water consumption by 95%. The range of building types that received other innovative awards include a commercial office space, a mixed-use industrial complex and office building, an elementary school, a condominium complex and a rental apartment building.
Beyond installing sustainable technologies, some finalists and winners also encouraged behavioral changes for their projects. Recognized achievements on that front include the launch of a carpool program, information-sharing about green living and messaging to tenants about the use of energy-efficient light bulbs and other home improvements.
All of the winners clearly deserved their walk down the green carpet. And congratulations to Urban Green Council for recognizing their critical work in such prestigious fashion!Russell Unger, Executive Director of Urban Green Council A proud winner. -
Stand Up and Cheer, the EBies are Here!
By Cecil Scheib Note: this blog is cross-posted from the Urban Green Council blog On Thursday, June 28, the first annual EBie Awards were held at the Hard Rock Café in Times Square. The EBies are a nationwide, juried competition that celebrates incre…